Talk:The Story of an African Farm

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: 19th century Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plot Summary - overall quality issues

The plot summary is really poor - it ends without even mentioning the second half of the book! As a whole, this article needs a major re-working - sections on characters and the discussion of themes do not even begin to touch on the complexities and textures of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.79.240.120 (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removals Reply

Why did you remove large amounts of sourced content with edit summary "Based on what source?" The source is cited with its DOI. I've restored it based on the edit summary. Dartslilly (talk) 09:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, my apologies for reverting what,in my haste, seemed unsourced. Rob van vee 10:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]